🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and families are watching closely to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising group of nations are exploring comparable bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that phones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". A law is expected to be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban could be "a potential options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on lawmakers to pass a proposal raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a comparable action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised parents to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is granted. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a good foundation," commented one MEP supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but stressing any action must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the government committed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. An organization established by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after encountering dangerous online content contends that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, legislation is primarily happening at the regional government level amid federal inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional time requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills mandating guardian approval for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from various politicians to follow Australia's path, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Outside of these regions, other nations are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global bodies take a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The agency points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve user protection.

While this worldwide discussion evolves, the actions of this nation and others demonstrate that states internationally are increasingly content to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.